ENOS11 Contemporary English Language 1

Must have + past participle shows a great deal of certainty that something happened, but there is still some doubt in the speaker’s mind. He/she is not 100% certain. For example:

The students did well on the test. They must have studied hard.

(There are other possible reasons why the students did well on the test. It might have been very easy, or they might have already learned the material. The speaker uses must have studied hard to show that he/she thinks this is the most logical reason they did so well.) For example:

I’ve phoned Jim several times, but he doesn’t answer. He must have gone out.

(The speaker believes this is the most logical reason why Jim doesn’t answer the phone. However, other reasons are possible. He might not have heard the phone, or he might not have wanted to talk to anyone.)

May, might and could convey the idea that a speaker is only 50% or less certain that something happened. The use of could implies a little more certainty. For example:

My wife doesn’t answer the phone. She may (might, could) have gone shopping.

(The speaker doesn’t know for sure that his wife went shopping. However, it is his best guess.)

Can’t or couldn’t have + past participle shows that the speaker is very certain something didn’t happen. For example:

Robin looks tired today. She can’t have slept well last night.

(This is the speaker’s best guess as to why Robin looks tired. Of course, other reasons are possible. For instance, she might be ill.)

May or might not have + past participle shows that the speaker is 50% or less certain that something didn’t happen. For example:

There was a strange light in the sky yesterday evening. I don’t know for sure what it was, but I may have seen a U.F.O. (Unidentified flying object).

An appropriate modal + have is used in most short answers. However, if the question has a be verb, the formula for responding is appropriate modal + have been. For example: